Back to the month index |
Back to the list index
|
Scot C. Bontrager (scot@sailormoon.org)
Tue, 21 Mar 2000 10:11:01 -0600 (CST)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: Joseph Bueno: "Re: about more pages"
- Previous message: George Reese: "Re: mSQL Re-awaking"
- In reply to: Rajat Tiwary: "mSQL Re-awaking"
- Next in thread: Rajat Tiwary: "Re: Re: mSQL Re-awaking"
- Maybe reply: Rajat Tiwary: "Re: Re: mSQL Re-awaking"
- Maybe reply: Rajat Tiwary: "Re: Re: mSQL Re-awaking"
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 10:11:01 -0600 (CST) From: "Scot C. Bontrager" <scot@sailormoon.org> Subject: Re: mSQL Re-awaking Message-ID: <Pine.BSO.4.21.0003211009450.26030-100000@tomoe.sailormoon.org>
I saw that list a few weeks ago. There are many things wrong with it as
far as mSQL is concerned. The goal of mSQL has always been speed and
stability at the cost of features and fluff.
On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, George Reese wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 06:14:14AM -0800, Rajat Tiwary mentioned:
> > We should put in efforts to make it more robust than
> > Mysql which by the way is NOT A RDBMS - ( refrence
> > http://www.postgresql.org/comp-comparison.html )
>
> MySQL is not a relational database??? Based on what?
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, go to http://www.Hughes.com.au/extras/email/
- Next message: Joseph Bueno: "Re: about more pages"
- Previous message: George Reese: "Re: mSQL Re-awaking"
- In reply to: Rajat Tiwary: "mSQL Re-awaking"
- Next in thread: Rajat Tiwary: "Re: Re: mSQL Re-awaking"
- Maybe reply: Rajat Tiwary: "Re: Re: mSQL Re-awaking"
- Maybe reply: Rajat Tiwary: "Re: Re: mSQL Re-awaking"