Back to the month index |
Back to the list index
|
David J. Hughes (bambi@Hughes.com.au)
Mon, 12 Apr 1999 11:14:07 +1000 (EST)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: psamuel@ind.tansu.com.au: "The mSQL FAQ reminder"
- Previous message: Jason Wilkes: "Another Sig 11 unsolved ?"
- Next in thread: James E. Harrell: "Re: un-enforced "unique" indices"
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 11:14:07 +1000 (EST) From: "David J. Hughes" <bambi@Hughes.com.au> Subject: Re: un-enforced "unique" indices Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990412111149.1348D-100000@fawn.hughes.com.au>
On Sat, 10 Apr 1999, James E. Harrell wrote:
> Having a problem with unique indices... The index will enforce UNIQUE
> when you attempt to insert *new* data, but when you update current data
> in an indexed field, it allows non-unique data to be created... any
> suggestions?
Can you provide a test script that produces this as our tests show that an
UPDATE is subjected to unique index testing
mSQL > update foo set v1 = '1' where v1 = '123456789'
-> \g
ERROR : Non unique value for unique index
> The create index clause looks like this:
> CREATE UNIQUE INDEX idx_cid on categories (categoryID)
> CREATE UNIQUE INDEX idx_cid_gid on categories (category_name, groupID)
>
> Shouldn't this allow duplicate categories ONLY if the groupID is
> different? In other words, several different groups can have categories
> by the same name. But a single group can not have 2 categories by the
> same name.
No. If the combination of 'categor_name,groupID' is different then it's a
unique index value.
Bambi
...
- Next message: psamuel@ind.tansu.com.au: "The mSQL FAQ reminder"
- Previous message: Jason Wilkes: "Another Sig 11 unsolved ?"
- Next in thread: James E. Harrell: "Re: un-enforced "unique" indices"