Back to the month index |
Back to the list index
|
David J. Hughes (bambi@Hughes.com.au)
Thu, 8 Apr 1999 17:24:10 +1000 (EST)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: David Palmer: "Converting a 6 digit date to mSQL Date format"
- Previous message: Mitch Shields: "Re: Thinking out loud re: w3-msql"
- In reply to: David J. Hughes: "Re: Thinking out loud re: w3-msql"
- Next in thread: Jean-Oliver Holingue: "Re: Lite / Form Question"
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 17:24:10 +1000 (EST) From: "David J. Hughes" <bambi@Hughes.com.au> Subject: Re: Thinking out loud re: w3-msql Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990408172248.469E-100000@fawn.hughes.com.au>
On Thu, 8 Apr 1999, Mitch Shields wrote:
> Great info Bambi, thanks.
>
> That does bring one more question to mind. If blocks of HTML are just stuck
> into an echo, is it more efficient to do all the coding in a w3-msql file as
> script (ie no straight HTML), or is the difference negligable?
It is exactly the same. The parser generates exactly the same code as if
you did it yourself. Using HTML blocks will probably be better (as you'll
use larger chunks resulting in fewer function calls) and is certainly
easier to read and work with.
Bambi
...
- Next message: David Palmer: "Converting a 6 digit date to mSQL Date format"
- Previous message: Mitch Shields: "Re: Thinking out loud re: w3-msql"
- In reply to: David J. Hughes: "Re: Thinking out loud re: w3-msql"
- Next in thread: Jean-Oliver Holingue: "Re: Lite / Form Question"