Back to the month index |
Back to the list index
|
Corey Sanders (csanders@entropy.muc.muohio.edu)
Tue, 6 Apr 1999 23:58:12 -0400 (EDT)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: Fernando Maior: "Re: Lite + sendmail together: howto?"
- Previous message: David J. Hughes: "Re: Lite / Form Question"
- In reply to: Corey Sanders: "Re: Lite / Form Question"
- Next in thread: David J. Hughes: "Re: Lite / Form Question"
- Reply: David J. Hughes: "Re: Lite / Form Question"
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 23:58:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Corey Sanders <csanders@entropy.muc.muohio.edu> Subject: Re: Lite / Form Question Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9904062354250.9538-100000@entropy.muc.muohio.edu>
If your up to it, an indexed loop seems like it would be a good addition
too.
EX|
for( $i=0; i< # $array; $i++ )
{
}
On Tue, 6 Apr 1999, David J. Hughes wrote:
> > What you've presented here is wonderful. Let me be the first to give it
> > full support. I hadn't considered adding the derefernce aspect. It is a
> > nice way of handling the possible memory issue I brought up.
>
> Sounds good. We'll keep it on the list.
>
>
> > While your adding things, is there any possibility of adding a defined
> > operator/function?
>
> Sure, why not. A simple hook into the symtab code will not be a problem.
>
> If there are other things that people would like to see in the core Lite
> language then please speak up. 2.1 is the perfect chance to get major
> changes into the code-base.
>
>
> Bambi
> ..
>
- Next message: Fernando Maior: "Re: Lite + sendmail together: howto?"
- Previous message: David J. Hughes: "Re: Lite / Form Question"
- In reply to: Corey Sanders: "Re: Lite / Form Question"
- Next in thread: David J. Hughes: "Re: Lite / Form Question"
- Reply: David J. Hughes: "Re: Lite / Form Question"